Investing in real estate and stock markets are popular ways to grow wealth, but can combining them in a portfolio provide the benefits of diversification for investors in the Philippines? According to a recent study presented at the International Conference on Business and Economics by Assistant Professor Agosto from the University of San Carlos, the answer is no.
Agosto’s paper highlighted the positive relationship between the Philippine real estate and stock markets in both the long and short term. While this may seem like a positive development, Agosto’s research suggests that investors cannot gain the benefits of diversification by including both markets in their portfolios.
Agosto’s research also suggests that the causal relationship between the Philippine real estate and stock markets is unidirectional, with stock prices tending to outperform housing prices. This indicates the presence of a wealth effect, with stock market performance contributing positively to the rise in the real estate market. As a result, real estate is used considerably more as an investment vehicle in the Philippines, and house prices are rather high.
While real estate and stock markets are good investment options on their own, Agosto’s findings suggest that investors cannot gain the benefits of diversification by building a portfolio that includes both markets in the Philippines.
This has important implications for investors and policymakers in the country. While real estate and stock markets may seem like attractive options for investment allocation, investors must be aware that including both markets in their portfolios does not offer enough diversification benefits. Instead, they should consider other investment options to diversify their portfolio and manage risk effectively.
Agosto’s study is a valuable contribution to the body of knowledge on real estate in the Philippines, which has a dearth of research on the topic. His work sheds light on the interdependence of the real estate and stock markets in the country, providing important insights for investors and policymakers.
Investors should be aware that including both markets in their portfolio does not provide enough diversification benefits. Instead, alternative investment options should be considered to manage risk effectively.

Land valuation is the most common appraisal assignment. An appraiser uses different method of valuation taking in consideration the purpose of the appraisal. But land differs in sizes, shapes and probable uses that an appraiser should look up to. Land which is large enough has different characteristics that warrants equal if not special attention. Besides, large tract of land requires more data and sets of comparable in using sales comparison method to arrive in a reliable and defensible market value.
One day, I was asked to observe in a meeting of real estate practitioners. They were finalizing the asking price of a property that has just listed. One of them opined that they can base it to the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Zonal Value, while the other one, succumbed to the pricing that is based on the prevailing prices of properties in the area. I almost bolted from my seat to immediately correct the practitioners.




Real estate valuation is the process of developing an opinion of value. It can be used in determining the value of property whether single use or mixed use development.
On Tuesday, Nov. 17, the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) kicked-off the Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) Summit 2015, with the theme, “Innovation and Big Ideas: Pushing Boundaries” that aims to challenge the traditional framework and mindset of micro and SMEs to further innovate their businesses.